Please send all inquires to,
feedback@dimends.com
feedback@dimends.com
| Copyright © 2010 Dimends, All rights Reserved. |
Dear You,
Civilocity is a form of government where the people watch the ruler entirely amongst their reign.
Is a better educated society a better society? What separates man from other animals is our ability
to have law. Then why don't our leaders ensure law? This philosophy of civilocity wont stop until it's
accomplished.
Civilocity, there are two countries one where you can watch the leader of the country and in the
other country you cant watch the leader of the country. Which country do you want to live in?
Democracy is you can pick your leader in this country and in the other country you cant pick your
leader by majority vote. Which country do you want to live in?
I realized that me not answering a question is not helping in a civilized manner. So I decided to
answer some of the questions in which I have sent.
Would you rather vote between two people and one wins to lead you or watch the leader the entire
time they are in office to ensure law? (I would rather watch the leader the entire time they are in
office to ensure law. We already have laws that say you can't kill. Having a human with law would be
more intelligent than picking a human without.) That's democracy verse civilocity. What if you could
put them both together? (Yes, I would have a government instating civilocity and democracy.)
I understood that me creating civilocity means I am the first teacher of it and yet I also must be the
first student. All I know is there have been to many leaders appointed by the people who have taken
part in unlawful action leading to over 100 million lives in the last century alone.
The head professors in the philosophy department at GWU (Washington DC) and UCL (London) have
both replied that teaching civilocity would not occur without more experience yet knowledge is not
experience its fate. I reluctantly must opinionate that they are making great mistakes and both
should persuade their common councils that not having a college course on civilocity taught by me,
who wrote it, would be a great tragedy to the intelligence of the college level students let alone the
population. What is a debate without the discussion of Civilocity; the benefits and disadvantages of
'watching the person whom you voted to power in a democracy the entire time that person is in
service to you?' (I think a debate without ensuring law is monkey talk.) Any senator, representative,
or person opposed of civilocity is asking not to know the full story. Is a better educated society a
better society? (Yes that's the difference between man and monkey.) A candidate not running on
civilocity will not have the people’s best interest at heart. The difference between an open society
and civilocity is that, in an open society there would be no intelligence agencies. Do you know the
difference between anarchy and monarchy? (Yes) Civilocity compared to an open society is like
comparing anarchy to monarchy. Surely there is a loss of intelligence that is at the college level and
that is present in my writing which needs to be addressed.
Thus having the correct experience and diploma is surely imperious to the knowledge of civilocity
and I must reconcile our differences and urge you to emphasize the importance that civilocity
brings. Civilocity must be treated like a candidate with no chance to lose because it contains no
deadline, it’s inevitable.
Would Americans be safer watching the leader of Russia the entire time that person is in power in a
democracy? (Yes) Would Russians be safer? (Yes) The same goes for any country would Americans
be safer watching the leader of China the entire time that person is in office? (Yes) Would Chinese
be safer? (Yes)
Would you end genocide if it would cost you your privacy? (Yes without question)
A world instating civilocity means no two countries will be at war without other interference. Do you
invest in scientist to cure a disease? (Yes) How about curing war between nations, the one disease
no scientist ever cured, no doctor ever saved, and no religion ever stopped? (Yes, I have put time
which is more important then money into my effort. I have answered my questions and proved that
me not answering my own questions means I am the first person who isn't even helping the effort I
am writing and teaching.) This is going to change the world more than a certain president of color or
gender, a scientist curing a disease, a doctor curing a patient, a religion of peace, or a movement for
one sect of people to vote. The person who fights for civilocity will be seen as Martin Luther King Jr.,
George Washington, or even Plato.
Civilocity is as real as democracy. Civilocity would end genocide in any country by watching the
leader. Democracy only benefits 51 percent of the people and civilocity benefits 100 percent of the
people. Now think about the 4000 soldiers who died in Iraq and what they were fighting for and the
real answer is democracy instead of a horrible tyrant that wouldn’t be able to achieve power in a
country when civilocity is instated saving over 4000 American lives 200,000 Iraq’s and over six
hundred billion dollars. Civilocity could have saved thousands of lives and billions of dollars by
asking do you want to be hanged or watched by the people the entire time you are representing
them to prevent you from cover ups, secret meetings and corruption. The world depends on better
forms of government to give the people higher chances to succeed through innovations and cures.
The error is that it's still not talked about on TV and that’s the American intelligence not doing a
damn thing to save a life.
The only fathomable thing is the president is working against me. Why? Too stop civilocity. Why? So
him and other leaders can hold unto power so they can continue conducting business unlawfully.
What happens when you conduct business unlawfully? You harm someone. What happens when
you harm someone unlawfully? You create an insurgency. What happens when you create an
insurgency? They fly a plane into a building knocking it down. What happens when they fly a plane
into a building and knock it down? Over 4000 american soldiers get killed trying to make sure it
doesn't happen again. What happens when the president goes against the military by creating an
insurgency? The president gets killed.
You are creating an insurgency by everyone who is affected with the united states of america's
government keeping civilocity quiet. I am affected by the united states of america's government
keeping civilocity quiet.
America better think fast before there is a riot their. I highly advise America to communicate directly
to me within a day. If they don't I might not communicate with them. This is how terrorists are born,
this is how they are home grown, and this is how America builds an insurgency. If you don't let us
live in peace than we will live in war. I might be part of the riot being peaceful or non peaceful you
would have to watch me. Watch me on the battlefields for I am the one you must fear. America is in
war with Iraq and Afghanistan, and letting someone die is how you make there family and friends
terrorists, that are from that area or elsewhere, and that creates an insurgency.
Would watching the president of Afghanistan the entire time help you? Help yourself. Would it help
the soldiers? Tell them to help themselves. You are part of the dumbest government in the world
living in the United States of America.
Imagine someone from the United Nations carrying a gun and keeping the idea of civilocity quiet.
The second an economy goes in debt as a country we need to raise taxes and collect more money
or decrease spending. A government doesn’t know the value of time because a government isn’t
living that’s why knowledge and change is suppressed which is inevitable like democracy, woman
voting, and African Americans voting. People are the ones who must take responsibility for change
and step up to the government. People are the ones who must speak of change to the masses in a
manner to address the most citizens in a peaceful way immediately unless the people will be a body
like the government who aren't living. I don’t understand why you aren’t talking to the masses about
watching the person who collects about 30 percent of all the money you make the entire time that
person is representing you.
Teaching to watch your leader is the only thing not taught in society, until now. Watching the leader
live on channel one the entire time would ensure the country is lead by a person who ensures law.
Who wouldn’t want to watch the president the entire time that person is in office? (I don't know.)
With this idea to ensure law who would fight against me and withhold this idea from the public for
even a day? (I know)
You desiring to be a part of this you can answer the questions and then send the answers to me via
the email address below. Then you can send this letter out to someone else and tell them to send
you the answers to the questions and make sure to tell that person to send this letter out to
someone else and ensure that they receive the answers and so on.
When this country gets attacked nobody knows why, maybe because the leader isn’t watched the
entire time leading the law so the people know the law is being followed. Not only that, I will provide
you with an amendment that I sent to the senate.
Don’t you think its more important to talk to me about civilocity. Isn't that life and death as well on a
larger scale.
"Is democracy more true than heaven, is civilocity more true than god?" (Yes, yes)
Nathaniel I. Wenger
Civilocity is a form of government where the people watch the ruler entirely amongst their reign.
Is a better educated society a better society? What separates man from other animals is our ability
to have law. Then why don't our leaders ensure law? This philosophy of civilocity wont stop until it's
accomplished.
Civilocity, there are two countries one where you can watch the leader of the country and in the
other country you cant watch the leader of the country. Which country do you want to live in?
Democracy is you can pick your leader in this country and in the other country you cant pick your
leader by majority vote. Which country do you want to live in?
I realized that me not answering a question is not helping in a civilized manner. So I decided to
answer some of the questions in which I have sent.
Would you rather vote between two people and one wins to lead you or watch the leader the entire
time they are in office to ensure law? (I would rather watch the leader the entire time they are in
office to ensure law. We already have laws that say you can't kill. Having a human with law would be
more intelligent than picking a human without.) That's democracy verse civilocity. What if you could
put them both together? (Yes, I would have a government instating civilocity and democracy.)
I understood that me creating civilocity means I am the first teacher of it and yet I also must be the
first student. All I know is there have been to many leaders appointed by the people who have taken
part in unlawful action leading to over 100 million lives in the last century alone.
The head professors in the philosophy department at GWU (Washington DC) and UCL (London) have
both replied that teaching civilocity would not occur without more experience yet knowledge is not
experience its fate. I reluctantly must opinionate that they are making great mistakes and both
should persuade their common councils that not having a college course on civilocity taught by me,
who wrote it, would be a great tragedy to the intelligence of the college level students let alone the
population. What is a debate without the discussion of Civilocity; the benefits and disadvantages of
'watching the person whom you voted to power in a democracy the entire time that person is in
service to you?' (I think a debate without ensuring law is monkey talk.) Any senator, representative,
or person opposed of civilocity is asking not to know the full story. Is a better educated society a
better society? (Yes that's the difference between man and monkey.) A candidate not running on
civilocity will not have the people’s best interest at heart. The difference between an open society
and civilocity is that, in an open society there would be no intelligence agencies. Do you know the
difference between anarchy and monarchy? (Yes) Civilocity compared to an open society is like
comparing anarchy to monarchy. Surely there is a loss of intelligence that is at the college level and
that is present in my writing which needs to be addressed.
Thus having the correct experience and diploma is surely imperious to the knowledge of civilocity
and I must reconcile our differences and urge you to emphasize the importance that civilocity
brings. Civilocity must be treated like a candidate with no chance to lose because it contains no
deadline, it’s inevitable.
Would Americans be safer watching the leader of Russia the entire time that person is in power in a
democracy? (Yes) Would Russians be safer? (Yes) The same goes for any country would Americans
be safer watching the leader of China the entire time that person is in office? (Yes) Would Chinese
be safer? (Yes)
Would you end genocide if it would cost you your privacy? (Yes without question)
A world instating civilocity means no two countries will be at war without other interference. Do you
invest in scientist to cure a disease? (Yes) How about curing war between nations, the one disease
no scientist ever cured, no doctor ever saved, and no religion ever stopped? (Yes, I have put time
which is more important then money into my effort. I have answered my questions and proved that
me not answering my own questions means I am the first person who isn't even helping the effort I
am writing and teaching.) This is going to change the world more than a certain president of color or
gender, a scientist curing a disease, a doctor curing a patient, a religion of peace, or a movement for
one sect of people to vote. The person who fights for civilocity will be seen as Martin Luther King Jr.,
George Washington, or even Plato.
Civilocity is as real as democracy. Civilocity would end genocide in any country by watching the
leader. Democracy only benefits 51 percent of the people and civilocity benefits 100 percent of the
people. Now think about the 4000 soldiers who died in Iraq and what they were fighting for and the
real answer is democracy instead of a horrible tyrant that wouldn’t be able to achieve power in a
country when civilocity is instated saving over 4000 American lives 200,000 Iraq’s and over six
hundred billion dollars. Civilocity could have saved thousands of lives and billions of dollars by
asking do you want to be hanged or watched by the people the entire time you are representing
them to prevent you from cover ups, secret meetings and corruption. The world depends on better
forms of government to give the people higher chances to succeed through innovations and cures.
The error is that it's still not talked about on TV and that’s the American intelligence not doing a
damn thing to save a life.
The only fathomable thing is the president is working against me. Why? Too stop civilocity. Why? So
him and other leaders can hold unto power so they can continue conducting business unlawfully.
What happens when you conduct business unlawfully? You harm someone. What happens when
you harm someone unlawfully? You create an insurgency. What happens when you create an
insurgency? They fly a plane into a building knocking it down. What happens when they fly a plane
into a building and knock it down? Over 4000 american soldiers get killed trying to make sure it
doesn't happen again. What happens when the president goes against the military by creating an
insurgency? The president gets killed.
You are creating an insurgency by everyone who is affected with the united states of america's
government keeping civilocity quiet. I am affected by the united states of america's government
keeping civilocity quiet.
America better think fast before there is a riot their. I highly advise America to communicate directly
to me within a day. If they don't I might not communicate with them. This is how terrorists are born,
this is how they are home grown, and this is how America builds an insurgency. If you don't let us
live in peace than we will live in war. I might be part of the riot being peaceful or non peaceful you
would have to watch me. Watch me on the battlefields for I am the one you must fear. America is in
war with Iraq and Afghanistan, and letting someone die is how you make there family and friends
terrorists, that are from that area or elsewhere, and that creates an insurgency.
Would watching the president of Afghanistan the entire time help you? Help yourself. Would it help
the soldiers? Tell them to help themselves. You are part of the dumbest government in the world
living in the United States of America.
Imagine someone from the United Nations carrying a gun and keeping the idea of civilocity quiet.
The second an economy goes in debt as a country we need to raise taxes and collect more money
or decrease spending. A government doesn’t know the value of time because a government isn’t
living that’s why knowledge and change is suppressed which is inevitable like democracy, woman
voting, and African Americans voting. People are the ones who must take responsibility for change
and step up to the government. People are the ones who must speak of change to the masses in a
manner to address the most citizens in a peaceful way immediately unless the people will be a body
like the government who aren't living. I don’t understand why you aren’t talking to the masses about
watching the person who collects about 30 percent of all the money you make the entire time that
person is representing you.
Teaching to watch your leader is the only thing not taught in society, until now. Watching the leader
live on channel one the entire time would ensure the country is lead by a person who ensures law.
Who wouldn’t want to watch the president the entire time that person is in office? (I don't know.)
With this idea to ensure law who would fight against me and withhold this idea from the public for
even a day? (I know)
You desiring to be a part of this you can answer the questions and then send the answers to me via
the email address below. Then you can send this letter out to someone else and tell them to send
you the answers to the questions and make sure to tell that person to send this letter out to
someone else and ensure that they receive the answers and so on.
When this country gets attacked nobody knows why, maybe because the leader isn’t watched the
entire time leading the law so the people know the law is being followed. Not only that, I will provide
you with an amendment that I sent to the senate.
Don’t you think its more important to talk to me about civilocity. Isn't that life and death as well on a
larger scale.
"Is democracy more true than heaven, is civilocity more true than god?" (Yes, yes)
Nathaniel I. Wenger
| A rough copy of civilocity can be found in 'Trunks and Asses' by clicking here. |
All donations are much appreciated to continue making the essay available for free
and continue advertising civilocity until its instated. All questions please email
Nathaniel at feedback@dimends.com All donations please click donate below. To
read Civilocity act 2010, the amendment, you will be redirected by clicking here. To
read another letter that summarizes the essay can be read by reading any of the
four other letters in the Poems section.
and continue advertising civilocity until its instated. All questions please email
Nathaniel at feedback@dimends.com All donations please click donate below. To
read Civilocity act 2010, the amendment, you will be redirected by clicking here. To
read another letter that summarizes the essay can be read by reading any of the
four other letters in the Poems section.